12 I want you to know, brothers, that what has happened to me has really
served to advance the gospel, 13 so
that it has become known throughout the whole imperial guard and to all the
rest that my imprisonment is for Christ. 14 And
most of the brothers, having become confident in the Lord by my imprisonment,
are much more bold to speak the word without fear.
15 Some indeed preach Christ from envy and rivalry, but others from good
will. 16 The latter
do it out of love, knowing that I am put here for the defense of the gospel. 17 The former proclaim
Christ out of selfish ambition, not sincerely but thinking to afflict me in my
imprisonment. 18 What
then? Only that in every way, whether in pretense or in truth, Christ is
proclaimed, and in that I rejoice. Yes,
and I will rejoice,
Philippians 1:12-18
There are two problems
in this passage we just read. The first
problem is the most common problem, which is the problem of fear. In this case, Christians were afraid of being
Christians simply because their leader, Paul, was imprisoned. As we all know imprisonment is naturally
associated with bad things. Commonly we
are not rejoicing when we are put in prison.
In the same way, when the Christians in Philippi knew that Paul was put
in prison because of being a Christian, they naturally became afraid. It is very likely that they were afraid
because of the possibility of them being put in prison just like Paul. This is why Paul told them:
12 I want you to know, brothers, that what
has happened to me has really served to advance the gospel, 13 so that it has
become known throughout the whole imperial guard and to all the rest that my
imprisonment is for Christ. 14 And
most of the brothers, having become confident in the Lord by my imprisonment,
are much more bold to speak the word without fear.
John Calvin rightly pointed out:
The
Apostle provides against this danger, when he states that the gospel had been
promoted by means of his bonds. The design, accordingly, of this detail is, to
encourage the Philippians, that they may not feel deterred by the persecution
endured by him.[1]
This encouragement by Paul was very much needed by the Philippians at
that time. Paul’s eyes were fixed on
advancement of the gospel even through his imprisonment and he wanted the
Philippians to see that as well. The
very fact that even the worse of conditions could be used by God to advance the
Gospel of Christ is proof that nothing can stop God. This should have comforted and encouraged the
Christians in Philippi. In our sermon
today I won’t reiterate further about the first problem and Paul’s solution to
it, since it is the most common problem we may find. Besides, we have so many passages of
Scripture tackling this similar problem. I
would like to proceed further to what I think is most unique in this passage,
which does not occur anywhere else. I’m
going to ask you to give me your undivided attention from here on.
Now, Paul’s
encouragement in verses 12-14 did not solve the second problem, however. It only solved the first problem. The second problem was more problematic. Paul stated bluntly:
15 Some indeed preach Christ from envy and
rivalry, but others from good will. 16 The
latter do it out of love, knowing that I am put here for the defense of the
gospel. 17 The
former proclaim Christ out of selfish ambition, not sincerely but thinking to
afflict me in my imprisonment.
When Paul ended his encouragement in verse 14, he said that most of the
brothers were fearless in speaking the word of God because of their becoming
more confident in the Lord Jesus despite Paul being imprisoned. Paul’s imprisonment became like a catalyst
for them to stand up and take Paul’s place in advancing the gospel even
more. However, some of them did not
preach out of good will, instead they preached the word out of envy and rivalry. This is the second trouble, and it is much
more troubling than the first.
Why more troubling? Because their motive to proclaim the gospel
was aimed at hurting Paul, knowing that Paul was in prison because of the
gospel. Now, this doesn’t make sense,
how could a person would preach the gospel in order to hurt Paul who was
already in prison?
Some people have attempted to explain that these people
were the people with twisted theology, like the Judaizers and others, and since
they disagreed with Paul’s theology, thus with Paul being in prison they seized
the opportunity to spread their theology.
Therefore Paul was hurt in prison because he could not do anything to
stop them. While many people would see
that their argument could be reasonable, this is actually not the case
here. Because, that was the case Paul
would be mad and not rejoicing. Compare
Paul’s attitude here and the one in Galatians 1:6-9:
6 I am astonished that you are so quickly
deserting him who called you in the grace of Christ and are turning to a
different gospel— 7 not
that there is another one, but there are some who trouble you and want to
distort the gospel of Christ. 8 But even if we or an angel from heaven should
preach to you a gospel contrary to the one we preached to you, let him be
accursed. 9 As we have said before, so now I say again: If
anyone is preaching to you a gospel contrary to the one you received, let him
be accursed.
Whereas here in Philippians 1:18 Paul says:
18 What then? Only that in every way, whether
in pretense or in truth, Christ is proclaimed, and in that I rejoice. Yes, and I will rejoice,
Theologians by the names of I-Jin Loh and Eugene Albert Nida pointed out:
Those
persons did, in fact, proclaim Christ, but they did not do so with pure
motives.[2]
Another theologian by the name Kent Hughes elaborated further:
Paul’s
detractors were preaching the Biblical Jesus. They were not anti-Christ but
anti-Paul.
They preached
the true gospel motivated by a warped amalgam of perversity. Again, they
preached Christ “out of rivalry” (v. 15) or out of selfish ambition. These
preachers were petty, territorial, calculating, and focused on self-promotion.
Paul’s diminution could mean their elevation.[3]
This fact is scary, because these so-called preachers of the gospel
exploited the condition where Paul was imprisoned in order to gain advantage
for themselves. It is like dancing on
other people’s misery kind of cruelty.
In a normal world, they should have shown sympathy to Paul. But they opted to walk in a perverted path
and exploited the holy gospel of Christ in order to bring down Paul and elevate
themselves. John Peter Lange et al. commented:
Though
the Apostle’s enemies preach Christ as do the others, they do not, like them,
seek to edify the church, and to assist the Apostle, but stir up strife and
hatred against him. They preach Jesus as the promised one, that those who hear
may say: ‘This is indeed also Christian preaching; we need not run after Paul.’
They thus draw the church to themselves, and withdraw it from Paul. They preach
concerning Christ essentially as he does, only either more strictly to please
those who are zealous for the law, or more loosely for the sake of those who
are still weak, or in a more rhetorical way, not to offend the cultivated, as
does the Apostle. Thus they not merely weaken the attachment of others to him,
and draw away his followers, but excite enmity against him, and thereby make
his imprisonment still more oppressive.[4]
This kind of trouble is tough. It
was tough for Paul. Being imprisoned
itself was tough already. Now, this
additional pain inflicted by those who exploited the gospel proclamation in
order to hurt him more. What a cruel
motive. They intended to steal Paul’s
fame. They intended to rob Paul of his
honor. These people thought that they
were at least the same like Paul and even better than him. They persuaded the Philippians that they did
not need Paul. Let Paul rot in
jail. In loneliness.
At first, it is kind of
hard to find this kind of cruel motive in the modern church. People seem to be nice to one another. Pastors and preachers especially are kind of
nice. But upon further reflections I can
actually catch a glimpse of a similar thing happening in the 21st
century church. Take for example, when a
senior pastor is preaching the gospel faithfully and yet the modern churchgoers
do not seem to like his sermon because he faithfully delivers God’s message as
the Scripture has said it even though it might be offensive to them, the people
begin to dislike the pastor. This senior
pastor does not shy away from the hot button issues such as the LGBT or the
evolution or the rise of free sex among the youths and the young adults, to
name a few. Week after week the senior
pastor continues to preach faithfully, and the church people gradually boycott
the pastor because they are offended. Knowing
that condition, the junior pastor sees a golden opportunity to get ahead; in
order for him to take the prominent position and thus to replace the senior
pastor. He knows that the senior pastor
is so bold in his sermon touching every hot button issue and calling the people
to repent from their sins. He also knows
that such move is unpopular among many.
So, in order to get ahead, he takes a different route. He decides to avoid all the hot button
issues, even though those issues need to be addressed because the world is
challenging the church precisely on those matters. The junior pastor does not stray away from the
good interpretation of the word, yet he refuses to address the important issues
for fear of offending the congregations and for gaining favor from them. Sure enough, the junior pastor gains more
attention and attendance each and every week.
When the junior preaches, the sanctuary is full. When the senior preaches, the sanctuary is
quite empty. The junior pastor preaches
more eagerly. But the motive is not to
carry God’s message faithfully or to assist the senior pastor, instead he means
to win the competition with the senior pastor.
He means to hurt the senior pastor who is already in pain because he is
rejected by the people even though he is being faithful to the Lord. In the end the goal is for the junior pastor
to take the position of the senior pastor and then the senior pastor to be
ousted from the church. If you really
know what’s going on in the modern church anywhere in the world, you will know
that what I have just described is not an imagination, but a sad reality. Yes, brothers and sisters, church politics do
exist and they are uglier than the secular politics. I hope this church is not participating in
such trend.
Now that we have touched
this gloom reality of the modern church which is similar to the issue plaguing
the Philippian church, our hearts must be troubled but it. How do we fix this troubling reality? How do we deal with it carefully and
accordingly? How do we battle this dirty
church politics (envy and rivalry; selfish ambition and all that) without
losing our integrity as Christian? The
answer lies in Paul’s attitude: “18 What then? Only that in every way, whether
in pretense or in truth, Christ is proclaimed, and in that I rejoice. Yes, and I will rejoice,”. This amazing attitude that Paul displayed
here is the key. This is how Paul
battled church politics in Philippi.
Paul knew that those preachers did not preach a different Jesus. So it was not false theology. They just preached the right content with the
wrong motive, which was to oust Paul and to gain advantage for themselves. They did it zealously in order to reduce
Paul’s significance and promote themselves.
But Paul said: “I don’t care.”
Ha! Paul did not care about his
own significance as long as Jesus Christ was proclaimed correctly. Paul rejoiced when Christ was proclaimed
accordingly. That’s it! That’s the brilliant solution! Theologian Peter Thomas O’Brien commented:
For
Paul the goal of the gospel’s advance overrides all else; thus his personal
inconveniences, sufferings, and imprisonment serve this end. He knows of this
surprising progress of the gospel because of the effects of his imprisonment
upon those outside the Christian community (v. 13) and because others within
the Christian fellowship have been given fresh courage for the work of
evangelism (v. 14).[5]
In the same line with O’Brien, Hughes emphasized Paul’s life purpose:
For
Paul, the advance of the gospel overrides all else. Everything in Paul’s life
is subsumed to this end. If we fail to understand this, we fail to understand
Paul.[6]
Paul is indeed an amazing human being.
He is an amazing Christian. Truly
faithful to the Lord. Sincerely loves
the Lord. Wholeheartedly devoted to his
Lord Jesus Christ. Yes, for Paul nothing
else matters, only the gospel of Christ to be advanced. The great English preacher, Charles Spurgeon
spoke beautifully about Paul:
Notice
the beautiful self-forgetfulness of the apostle Paul. So long as the gospel
could be more widely published, he did not mind where he was, or what he
suffered.[7]
Spurgeon continued:
Sweet
forgetfulness of self! So long as Christ is glorified, Paul does not mind how
he himself fares, nor what unkind motives towards himself may actuate other
preachers. This is real Christianity.[8]
Spurgeon added his comment about Paul in this context:
He
felt sure that it was a good thing for him to be in prison; that it would be a
good thing even if he had to die there; that it was well that many were
preaching Christ, even though some did it of ill will. For Christ was preached,
and the result could not be evil. And the troubles and trials of the churches
were good, for somehow or other they would be overruled for God’s glory.[9]
Yes, yes, and yes! O’Brien,
Hughes, and Spurgeon are absolutely right in commenting about Paul. His attitude solved this troubling reality. This kind of attitude ought to be adopted by
every faithful servant of God. Paul
nullified the adverse attack toward him personally by shifting the focus of
importance to the advancement of the gospel.
If the attack was toward the gospel, then Paul would zealously defend it
with his life.
Sadly, many “servants of
God” do exactly the opposite of what Paul did.
They nullify the attack toward the gospel of Christ by considering the
gospel needs to be compromised. And they
defend their personal reputation like there is nothing else more important in
life when the attack is directed toward them personally. In short, these modern “servants of God” are
self-centered. They do not care for the
gospel. They use the gospel for their
own gain. Very contrast to Paul.
Now, the senior pastor
does not need to be mad toward the junior as long as the junior continues to
preach Christ without compromise. In
that way, the senior pastor could then nullify the malicious motive of the junior
pastor and allow God to use the preaching to advance the gospel. If the junior pastor starts twisting the
gospel, then the senior pastor must jump in and do what he must in order to
bring the people back to the truth, to the untwisted gospel. Paul overlooked the personal attack for the
sake of the gospel. For Paul, the gospel
of Christ is more important than anything else.
Now, the senior pastor, and all other servants of God who suffer a
similar attack, should also overlook the personal attack for the sake of the
gospel. In that way, the gospel of
Christ is advanced, and Christians may rejoice as God is glorified, for the
gospel of Christ is more important than anything else.
Now, the last lesson is the
wider application of the understanding about the prominence of the gospel of
Christ. Its application cannot be
confined in the similar case that Paul experienced with the ill willed
preachers. D. A. Carson pointed out
wonderfully:
Paul’s
example is impressive and clear: Put the advance of the gospel at the center of
your aspirations. Our own comfort, our bruised feelings, our reputations, our
misunderstood motives—all of these are insignificant in comparison with the
advance and splendor of the gospel. As Christians, we are called upon to put
the advance of the gospel at the very center of our aspirations.
What are
your aspirations? To make money? To get married? To travel? To see your
grandchildren grow up? To find a new job? To retire early? None of these is
inadmissible; none is to be despised. The question is whether these aspirations
become so devouring that the Christian’s central aspiration is squeezed to the
periphery or choked out of existence entirely.[10]
This is tougher, because we then have to evaluate our own interior
self. We need to be careful of our
priority. What Carson is arguing is
whether our aspiration would make us blind of the most important aspiration every
Christian ought to achieve. Even the
hard-working pastors can be blinded by their own aspirations and thus no
longer able to see the importance of the gospel of Christ. Hughes said the same thing as Carson with
different emphases:
When
the gospel is no longer the main thing, when it becomes assumed, the next
generation may be lost. As evangelicals we must take note. All kinds of issues
cry for our attention—abortion, pornography, media bias, economic justice,
racial discrimination, classism, sexism, to name a few. And we need to be alert
and involved in certain of them. But if any of them become the main thing so
that the gospel is marginalized, beware![11]
Brothers and sisters, I have met in person pastors who put the gospel of
Christ at the very bottom of the stack so that they could advance their own
agenda. One of the most common agendas,
and this is the agenda of the pastors I met, is that of comfortable life. For the sake of living comfortably, these
pastors figured they had to “obey” the desires of the congregations that were
represented by the council members. So
they resolved that the boss of the church is the council. Came the point where the people, through the
council, demanded that the gospel be twisted.
And in the case of the pastors I met in person, some of the compromises
were about evolution and LGBT. In order
to satisfy the demand of the people, these pastors compromised the Scripture
and gave in to the voice of science that spells evolution as the way the world
happened and not through the word of God.
And they also succumbed to the demand of the people to twist the gospel
to say that LGBT is not condemned by the Scripture. They did that so they could continue to live
comfortably in the wealthy church they were currently in. Rejecting the council, thus the people, would
mean they got kicked out of the church.
So they opted to marginalize the gospel in order to maintain their
lifestyle. This is the first kind, which
Carson spoke about.
The one Hughes talked
about is quite different. There are
Christians who then put the gospel in the back burner in order to deal with
matters that they believe to be more popular and that gain more support. Yes, more practical issues are answering
people’s immediate needs. While such
issues like social justice, abortion, and so on, should not be neglected,
throwing the gospel to the last car of the train for the sake of the more
popular issues is marginalizing the gospel of Christ. There are Christians who care more about
popular issues at the expense of the gospel of Christ. These people do not proclaim the good news of
God’s redemption in Christ, but they zealously help those in need of food,
clothing, shelter, and so on. Today we
see a new trend in the modern church where the church puts more emphasis on how
to acquire assets for the church organization, how to strengthen the financial
resources of the church organization, how to provide business training for
young adults so they may be successful materially in this world, how to teach
the wives how to please their husbands, how to educate the children so they
could be more prepared to face the industry 5.0, and the list goes on – but
this list does not include the advancement of the gospel at all. What I mean is that the main thrust of the
gospel has been stripped. The
proclamation of God’s salvation in Christ, the call to repentance, the call to
renounce sins and return to God, the need for forgiveness, the reconciliation
with God, all these are rendered irrelevant in many of the modern church
today. This is what Hughes warned us
about. Beware!
The remedy to these two
is the same. It is to adopt Paul’s
example. For Paul, the gospel of Christ
is more important than anything else. Not
social justice, not business training, not my own comfort, not my dream to be a
great preacher, none of that, but the gospel of Christ. And so, no matter what may befall us, as long
as the gospel is advanced, then we consider our misfortune nothing. As long as God is glorified, the gospel of
Christ is proclaimed, people return to God in true repentance, our suffering is
a small price to pay. Paul did
that. He sacrificed his reputation, his
physical and mental comfort, and everything actually, so that the gospel of
Christ can be advanced more and more. In
the final analysis, our text today speaks of this eternal theme: The Gospel of
Christ is More Important than Anything Else!
Amen!
[1] John Calvin and John Pringle, Commentaries on the Epistles of Paul the Apostle to the
Philippians, Colossians, and Thessalonians (Bellingham, WA: Logos Bible Software,
2010), 34.
[2] I-Jin Loh and Eugene Albert Nida, A Handbook on Paul’s Letter to the Philippians, UBS Handbook Series (New York:
United Bible Societies, 1995), 25.
[3] R. Kent Hughes, Philippians: The Fellowship of the Gospel, Preaching the Word (Wheaton, IL:
Crossway Books, 2007), 50.
[4] John Peter Lange et al., A Commentary on the Holy Scriptures: Philippians (Bellingham, WA: Logos Bible
Software, 2008), 21–22.
[5] Peter Thomas O’Brien, The Epistle to the Philippians: A Commentary on the Greek Text, New International Greek Testament
Commentary (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1991), 86.
[6] R. Kent Hughes, Philippians: The Fellowship of the Gospel, Preaching the Word (Wheaton, IL:
Crossway Books, 2007), 48.
[7] Charles Spurgeon, Spurgeon Commentary: Philippians, ed. Elliot Ritzema, Spurgeon
Commentary Series (Bellingham, WA: Lexham Press, 2014), 21.
[8] Charles Spurgeon, Spurgeon Commentary: Philippians, ed. Elliot Ritzema, Spurgeon
Commentary Series (Bellingham, WA: Lexham Press, 2014), 22.
[9] Charles Spurgeon, Spurgeon Commentary: Philippians, ed. Elliot Ritzema, Spurgeon
Commentary Series (Bellingham, WA: Lexham Press, 2014), 22–23.
[10] D. A Carson, Basics for Believers:
An Exposition of Philippians (Grand
Rapids, MI: Baker, 1996), 25-26.
[11] R. Kent Hughes, Philippians: The Fellowship of the Gospel, Preaching the Word (Wheaton, IL:
Crossway Books, 2007), 52.
No comments:
Post a Comment