Talking about education won’t be
complete without talking about discipline.
As we have known that discipline is one of the most important
ingredients in education. Often we won’t
be able to do good education without discipline. The importance of discipline in education is
probably like the importance of salt in every cooking. As a dish without salt tastes horrible,
education without discipline also tastes horrible. But as too much salt makes the dish inedible,
too much discipline also destroys education.
The key is to know how much is enough.
In education, however, discipline is not just about quantity, but more
importantly about the quality. When we
talk about the quality of discipline, one of the items to look for is the
methodology.
Educators can be creative in
exercising discipline. And for sure
educators are required to be creative in devising discipline methods that would
fulfill the objective and ethically sound in the process. To do so educators must understand a lot of
things in the domain of education. It
cannot be just a conjuring up of one’s imagination that is forced to be
implemented just because he has the power to do it, or just because there is no
other alternative in his mind, or just because it is beautiful in one’s
imagination, or just because it looks like it might work. The decision to employ a certain discipline
method must be with a strong conviction that the method will bring good that is
desired from discipline. The enforcer of
discipline must believe that when it is implemented the people undergoing
discipline will not need to go through the unnecessary suffering. Its implementation too must continue to
preserve the dignity of the person under discipline.
What must be understood is that the
word discipline contains within it the word disciple. This means that the idea of discipline must
generically aim toward the formation of disciple. The formation of disciple necessarily
requires teacher. Because one cannot
just become a disciple of nothing. There
should be a teacher. The disciple is
formed into becoming like the teacher.
Without a teacher existing, a disciple cannot exist. The teacher is the model to whom the disciple
is formed into. Jesus says in Matthew
10:24&25:
24 “A disciple is not above his teacher, nor a servant above
his master. 25 It is
enough for the disciple to be like his teacher, and the servant like his
master.
Discipline
process is meant to bring the disciple into the standard of the teacher. To discipline someone is to process him into
becoming a disciple. But then here who
the teacher is must be clear. The
teacher can’t be anybody. The teacher
must be a highly respected person, a dignified individual that lives a life of
propriety, following and exercising the highest ethical standard, mature in
character, wise in his mind, and walking in the path of righteousness. Then and only then the disciple would have
the motivation to undergo difficulties of discipline and bear the pain and
suffering of the process of discipline.
It is important to understand that to ask someone to suffer, meaning of
the suffering must be provided. It is
cruel to burden anyone with suffering without meaning or suffering that is not
worth it. It would be irrational to have
a teacher imposing discipline to his disciples but he never even lifts a finger
to shoulder the burden and suffering of the standard he is burdening his
disciples with. It is the utmost cruelty
and the most unfair treatment a teacher can do to his disciple. And there existed in the time of Jesus this
kind of teacher that Jesus had to condemn them for all the sins they committed:
46 And he said, “Woe to you lawyers also! For you load
people with burdens hard to bear, and you yourselves do not touch the burdens
with one of your fingers. (Luke 11:46)
For
discipline to be effective, the teacher must be the first to be willing to
suffer the gruesome pain necessary for the formation of the character. Then and only then he might have the right to
disciple his disciples through the discipline process.
I need to remind you that there are
two kinds of discipline. The first and
most common is the external discipline.
The second and the hardest to achieve is the internal discipline. One of the most important goals of education
is to achieve internal discipline.
Internal discipline or self-discipline is the kind of discipline that no
longer requires external forces or enforcers to keep the appropriation toward
the desired standard. The self guards
himself. This can only happen when the
self has already become or has achieved all the basics of the characters,
skills, and knowledge of the teacher.
The pattern is sure, the model is clear, and the disciple has walked the
path of his teacher. But before this
happens, the disciple needs external enforcement.
External
discipline is needed to get the disciple started. This process is quite difficult to do and is
often hard to experience. The difficulty
is due to the sinful nature we all inherit from Adam and Eve. Our sinful nature protests the discipline process. It rejects the appropriation toward
order. The natural instinct of the
sinful nature is to rebel against order, against structure, against anything
commanded and governed by God. External
discipline meets its most challenging situation because the disciples are
predisposed toward rejecting it.
Therefore, the discipline enforcer then must be endowed with
authority. Authority carries with it
power. This arrangement is necessary for
external discipline to work at all.
Without authority external discipline would not work. However, we also need to remember that
everybody has sinned, so authority and power can surely be abused by the
enforcer to serve his own twisted goal.
The result of the abuse is slavery or tyranny. That’s what is condemned by Jesus. The lawyers were given power that came with
their position among the high ranking leaders in Israel, but they did not use
their power to impose discipline in an appropriate manner. Instead, they used power to elevate
themselves and to enslave those under them through the framework of discipline
that was prepared by God in His Holy Scripture.
This abuse is real and rampant in the world of education. It is not to be ignored. So the disciples need to be protected from
the potential abuse by crooked teachers.
Ironically, the protector of the disciples is actually the teacher. The integrity of the teacher is to be
immaculate if complete protection is to be executed. Very early at the process we have dealt with
an almost impossible situation. James
warns his readers:
Not
many of you should become teachers, my brothers, for you know that we who teach
will be judged with greater strictness. (James 3:1)
In an
ideal world, to become a teacher, one must have embraced self-discipline. He must have passed beyond the external
discipline stage. But we live in the
sinful world. To find a person like that
would be impossible. There was only one
person like that, Jesus. For even Moses
made a grief mistake. Abraham too. David, you know it. Even Peter did too. Only Jesus was perfect. But at the same time the world needs teachers
and Jesus is physically in heaven now.
Teachers are needed to educate the next generation. They are needed to enforce discipline so that
the young people may grow following the proper path. At least the teachers that are to be given
the authority to enforce discipline on the young must themselves have become
the disciples of the master teacher. These
teachers are the extension of the master teacher. Therefore they are accountable to the master
teacher in carrying and executing discipline.
They must understand that when they disciple others, they are to make
them the disciple of the master teacher.
That is the ultimate goal.
18 And Jesus came and said to them, “All authority in heaven
and on earth has been given to me. 19 Go
therefore and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the
Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, 20 teaching them to observe all that I have
commanded you. And behold, I am with you always, to the end of the age.” (Matthew 28:18-20)
This
Great Commission is the eternal command of God to be obeyed by His faithful
disciples. In obeying this command the
teachers become the extension of Jesus who is God Himself and the Master
Teacher of all humans. The meaning of
becoming Jesus’ extension must be internalized within the spirit of the
person. Paul understands this when he
says: “Be imitators of me, as I am of
Christ.” (1 Corinthians 11:1). The implication of Paul’s statement is then
Jesus’ extension must imitate Him in order for others to be able to
imitate. In other words, we can’t become
teachers and thus the extension of Christ unless we have become like Jesus
Christ.
Educators around the world know that
the most effective teaching method is modeling.
Modeling is the most powerful tool in education if we are to achieve the
educational objectives of any subjects.
Modeling is only natural. It is
within the construct of our humanness.
This imitating the master teacher is in itself carrying the natural
authority to impose external discipline on others. The power of Paul’s words that urge the
Corinthians to imitate him is weighty and its impact is huge simply because he
has imitated Christ. Paul does not just
give order for people to do this or that without he himself first did it. Just like Jesus commands obedience, he
himself proved his obedience to the Father.
Therefore His command carries a terrifying weight that no one can reject
and not bear the consequences. As the
extension of the master teacher, teachers cannot then forget their
self-discipline and start behaving badly.
Listen to what Paul says in 1 Corinthians 9:24-27:
24 Do you not know that in a race all the runners run, but
only one receives the prize? So run that you may obtain it. 25 Every athlete
exercises self-control in all things. They do it to receive a perishable
wreath, but we an imperishable. 26 So
I do not run aimlessly; I do not box as one beating the air. 27 But I discipline my body
and keep it under control, lest after preaching to others I myself should be
disqualified.
Paul is
committed to Christ. As a teacher that
carries with him the name of the master teacher, he must behave in such a way
so as to continue in the path of discipline.
For he is a disciple of Christ forever.
Paul realizes that he is not the master teacher. He cannot set his own standard. He cannot be the standard. He cannot then follow his own will and break
away from the will of God. Paul
disciplines himself. This is
self-discipline. And with this he is
qualified to teach others. We too must
follow his example obviously.
Now,
after we have become His disciples, we are then tasked with realizing His
commission to make disciples of all nations.
The curriculum is set for the disciples to take. That is Jesus’ commands. Everything!
Because they are to become like Jesus.
They are to be made Jesus’ disciples.
The course of discipline is prepared for the road to live the life of
Jesus’ disciples. Before we go into much
more detail about becoming Jesus’ disciples, there are a couple practical
things we need to discuss regarding discipline.
One
of the keys of discipline is what most educators in the world know, which is
repetition. Repetition is a helpful tool
to get a person to remember. Remembering
is very important because it is the capital of our thinking. We need things that we remember if we are to
exercise our thinking capacity. If there
is nothing to remember, we can’t think of anything. Even a 20-30 seconds remembrance is enough to
get us going in our thinking process. It
would be much better if we can retain memories long term. Because our thinking process takes time and
so we need more than 30 seconds to process.
Repetition helps big time in getting our short term memory to jump into
the long term memory. However, we do not
then exercise repetition for every single short term memory. Remember that it takes time to repeat. And we vary in our ability to remember. Some people can remember just by one
glance. Most people have to spend more
time to do so, for example one must repeat a certain thing 10x or 100x in order
to remember them long term. So our
constraint within space and time prompts us to be selective. We cannot “waste” time and attempt the
impossible that is trying to remember everything. This will not happen. We are no God. We are mere humans. So we prioritize. In any kind of organizing activity under the
sun, we always have to prioritize.
Teachers’ role in this case is to help with the disciples’
priority. Since most disciples lack
wisdom, teachers must be the lighthouse for them. Teachers are expected to have wisdom to know
which must be prioritized. This is a
very difficult challenge to tackle.
Another
challenge to deal with is the understanding of the level of the disciples. As humans are diverse and complex being,
teachers find it quite difficult to fit a certain program or strategy or method
to everybody. There is no
one-size-fits-all strategy in this matter.
However, when it comes down to schooling, often one program is “forced”
to all kids. This organizing strategy is
meant for efficiency, not effectiveness.
This is known among educators as one of the biggest weaknesses of
schooling. We know that the most use
discipline method for little kids is rewards and punishment or in the modern
redaction stream R&P has become R&R – Reinforcement positive and
Reinforcement negative. The difference
between R&P and R&R is on the punishment part. In the R&P punishment is the imposing of
a negative action toward the disciple in order to discourage him of repeating
the undesired thought, emotion, or conduct.
P is then covering the taking away of the enjoyable thing and also the
application of painful thing on the disciple.
But in R&R there is no more punishment. The naming has changed into Reinforcement
negative. And Reinforcement negative
only covers the taking away of the enjoyable thing. It purposefully eliminates the application of
painful thing on the disciple. The
intention might be noble, that is to eliminate possibility of power abuse that
teachers may do to their disciples. So
their power is limited. But in practice,
the redaction takes away the thrust of punishment force that often is effective
in discouraging negative thought, emotion, and behavior. Not to mention that this redaction then
started a whole new paradigm, that punishment is bad, evil, and unnecessary. So any “teacher” imposing punishment to his disciple
is seen as cruel and unethical. They
might have solved the problem of power abuse within the education domain, but
they have also created a big problem by doing so. It is not a coincidence that this paradigm
shift blossomed amid the blossoming of the idea that humans are born sinless,
guiltless, and as clean as white linen.
Ever since then the landmark of education changed dramatically.
“Time-Out”
is the most used discipline method anywhere, be it in school, or at home, this
method of Reinforcement negative or probably it’s better to say Negative
Reinforcement (NR) is often used repeatedly to discourage a negative thought,
emotion, or behavior. However, for a
child in the sensorimotor stage (the first stage of Jean Piaget’s most famous
cognitive development theory) this NR thing is very difficult to grasp. For a child in the sensorimotor stage,
everything is about him. Things that do
not relate to him don’t exist. So if he
can’t experience it with his five senses, that thing is non-existence. How can he then grasp the idea of NR where
fun is taken away? Little kids under 2
is drawn toward moving things, so if things aren’t moving, they won’t even
bother to touch it. This poses a
challenge. How much more if we know that
up to age 7, children are having a hard time grasping the idea of cause and
effect. That their negative behavior for
example is the cause of them being given time out. They are still struggling to understand what
it means with the fun being taken away.
They would think that this is a new game, a game of hide and seek. So whenever they are given time out, taken
away from their toys and then put at the corner for a few minutes, they
wouldn’t stay at the corner. They would
venture out of the corner and attempt to find their toys. The more they are inhibited from approaching
their toys, the more eager they would wiggle and try to get to their toys. NR often fails here. Yes power abuse is somehow prevented, but the
goal of discouraging negative behavior is not achieved. So why are we doing it over and over again to
a two year old? It’s more of a
discipline for the teachers or parents rather than for the toddler.
To
our amazement, admitted or not, little kids that age respond better toward
punishment. P proves to be more effective
for discouraging negative behavior.
Especially the kind of P that inflicts direct painful experience. However, I must caution you here with a heavy
emphasis on “proceed with love.”
Whenever power is used to enforce discipline in the form of punishment,
extra love must be taken to balance out the force. Love puts brake on punishment so we won’t
inflict the unnecessary blow to our disciples.
Only the necessary blow that is aimed at discouraging the negative
behavior is to be performed. Proverbs
13:24 records:
24 Whoever spares the rod hates his son,
but he
who loves him is diligent to discipline him.
Love is
the motivation to use the rod meant for discipline. In this passage, God even warns people that
if we spare the rod and purposefully avoid inflicting direct painful experience
on our children we are said to hate our children. This is shocking for modern educators. But this maxim can’t be wrong, for it comes
from the perfect Being, our Creator, the great God of heaven and earth. So that kind of punishment has its place in
the context of education. If we analyze
more carefully, we will come to realize that our sinful nature is the main
factor of why it is necessary to use that painful punishment. But again, as mentioned in the passage above,
love must be the drive for using the rod.
Motivation is important. When we
hold power and we are about to use the power that can really damage, we must be
careful so we won’t destroy.
Consequently, when we are to use our power to enforce discipline through
painful punishment, we must be extremely careful so as not to destroy our
disciples. Their destruction should
never be our motif, as is written in Proverbs 19:18:
18 Discipline your son, for there is hope;
do not
set your heart on putting him to death.
Modern
educators would set themselves up against these proverbs. They would readily disagree on punishing
someone with a rod. For they fear that
the child would die if we do so.
Ironically, it is quite the contrary.
Proverbs 23:13-14 reveals:
13 Do not withhold discipline from a child;
if you
strike him with a rod, he will not die.
14 If you strike him with the rod,
you
will save his soul from Sheol.
God
reveals a mystery that actually we won’t kill our disciples when we punish them
with a rod. But instead, we are saving
them from hell. God knows everything and
so His knowledge is perfect. He cannot
be wrong, thus setting up against Him won’t succeed. If we withhold discipline in the form of
painful punishment from our children, it might mean that we actually hate them
(cf. Proverbs 13:24). I cannot warn you
enough that we must restrain ourselves with love. So even though we strike our children with a
rod, we won’t desire their death. So
this gives us an understanding that we ought not to fear the use of painful
punishment for discipline method. But we
ought to use it wisely.
Deciding what discipline strategy is
most effective for our disciples is not a walk in the park. With all the knowledge we have surveyed
above, it would be a struggle to implement what discipline method to use. So far we have discussed about NR and P. But we haven’t touched reward. Our modern world fancies reward way more than
punishment. Reward becomes the number
one choice of discipline method. It is
most effective when used to encourage positive thought, emotion, or
behavior. But it is very ineffective to
do the opposite. Children’s limitation
in their cognitive process must be taken into serious consideration. Kids cannot easily make the connection that
because certain behaviors are rewarded they ought not to repeat the undesired
behaviors. If the desired behavior is
rewarded then they would just think that doing such behavior brings them the
sweet reward. So they will repeat that
behavior for the purpose of getting the reward.
From the outset it seems like the use reward has caused the
internalization of a certain behavior.
Goal is achieved. For the use of
reward is meant to be the catalyst for the disciple to acquire the desired
behavior. However, in this sinful world,
within our sinful nature, often we do twist things around. If the common structure is for the desired
behavior to be achieved as the goal, and reward is the means to achieve it,
then through the use reward it is expected that the child would produce the
desired behavior and own it and continue to perform it even though there is no
reward. However, this common structure
is obliterated when the direction is turned upside down. Instead of the desired behavior becomes the
goal, sinful humans makes reward as the goal, and the means to achieve the
sweet reward is by performing the desired behavior. When this happens, education has failed. Discipline has been manipulated to produce a
different kind of disciple. He won’t
become a disciple of good behavior anymore, but he will become a disciple of
sweet reward.
This proves that even with reward,
discipline is not as easy as it looks.
Sinful nature hampers the discipline process. And the most used discipline method is proven
to be exploitable and twistable.
Therefore, it is widely understood that reward cannot stand alone. Or in the modern term, Positive Reinforcement
(PR) can’t be employed independent of NR or even P. The art of discipline must employ both. This is where things get interesting. Creativity must be sought. Let us consider one practical discipline
strategy widely used in school, the point system.
Say a school applies a point system
for the discipline strategy. Point
system employs the R&R method and not the R&P one. There are two ways to start this. One is to start from zero point. The other is to start with a certain point
already, 100 or 1000 pts., all is up to the school. Points can be subtracted or added depending
on whether the desired behavior or the undesired behavior is performed. So, when a desired behavior is performed
points are added. When an undesired
behavior is performed points are subtracted.
How many points to be added or subtracted will be arranged by the
school. Usually the school has to have a
scale that contains the value of the said behavior and the points (whether
added or subtracted). Say for example,
cleaning up after eating would be given PR by adding 1 pt. Whereas not cleaning up after eating would be
given NR by subtracting 3 pts. Now, the
point accumulation total would have a PR and NR in the end. Say by the end of the semester, if one
successfully accumulates 1000 pts. he could be awarded with best student award
trophy plus a $100 voucher to be spent in the school’s bookstore. On the other hand, if one fails to maintain a
minimum of 100 pts. at the end of the semester, then he would have to do an
assignment according to the discretion of the teacher. When normally students would be able to relax
right away at the end of the semester, he would have to work his assignment a
few more days before he can relax from all the school work. A portion of his free time is then taken away
from him as the consequence of the NR.
Hopefully by implementing PR or NR in the end, it would get the students
to think of performing the desired behavior and avoiding the undesired
ones. The point system is a way to
express the R&R discipline strategy.
Students would then be occupied with at least maintaining the minimum
points at the end of the semester. Some
would aim at getting the award.
On paper this strategy looks like it
is good and creative and would stimulate the performance of the desired
behavior and the shunning of the undesired behavior. However, in reality, this system meets many
challenges. Particularly when applied to
little kids. There are a couple of
weaknesses that we need to be aware of in this model, especially when applied
collectively in school. Little kids, for
one, are still struggling to understand the meaning of numbers. Kids under the age of 7 are struggling
mightily to conserve the imagination of numbers in their cognitive
functioning. It is extremely difficult
to demand them to understand the significance of numbers in the point system as
representing meaning that goes beyond the mere symbolic representative of how
many items there are. Even trying to
grasp the meaning of the number “1” which possibly could represent either one
apple or one orange or one elephant or one lego is still quite difficult for
kids below the concrete operational stage.
How much more trying to assign the meaning that if the points
accumulated fall below 100 would result in their fun being taken away for a
certain time period. Or even trying to
assign the meaning that if the points accumulated go beyond 1000 would result
in them being awarded a trophy and a $100 voucher. Thus this point system could potentially
spell disaster to little kids. As their
awareness level of this system is low, naturally, they would often act
independently of the point system. This
renders the point system meaningless for them.
The question then is: “Why bother implementing something that is
meaningless for the people who would suffer through it?” If we are to ask anyone to suffer, he/she
needs to understand its meaning.
Otherwise it would be cruel to burden him/her with suffering that he/she
does not understand the meaning.
Secondly, the PR system could create
imbalance for kids. Out of many kids
that suffer the system, only a few that would come out as those who excel and
thus be awarded. These select few
quickly become the elite. As they
receive honor, all the rest that do not are seen either as mediocre or failure. Particularly those who fall below the 100
points, they would then develop negative self-esteem that they are among those
who fail. The elite would learn the
feeling of pride while those who fail learn the feeling of embarrassment. The middle learn that they are the average
group, not as good and yet not as bad.
Class distinctions begin to develop.
So the learning objective is not achieved, and instead the other kind of
learning not planned is learned incidentally.
And this incidental learning is quite damaging in the long run. Why would we implement something that
potentially very likely be damaging for all who suffer through it? It would be absurd to persist on implementing
it.
Thirdly, little kids are still very
dependent on their caretakers. Once this
system is communicated, the parents in particular quickly learn the logic of
the system. And so it soon becomes the
burden of the parents to make sure that at least their kids would not fall
below 100. And it also soon becomes the
ambition of the parents to achieve beyond 1000 so the kids could be honored and
so they could gain the award. This then
leads to the responsibility shift.
Instead of the kids going through the learning process, the parents
actually are the ones that undergo the learning process. Once the pressure is shouldered by the
parents, the learning intended for the kids quickly fades away. Why implement something for a certain
intended group of people yet a different group of people are the ones actually
being impacted instead of the intended group?
It is undeniably a failure of the lesson plan when the intended audience
is not the one learning.
Fourthly, with their cognitive
ability is still at the preoperational stage, it is quite dreadful for the kids
to fall below 100 for consequently a certain kind of NR is being implemented so
that their joy is taken away for a time.
They don’t quite understand and are struggling to make the connection
that they have been performing the undesired behavior that has led to them
losing points, and that later they would suffer the meaningless assignment
without they could ever learn from it because their total points fall below
100. All the strings of deduction and
then the eventual consequence do not help the kids to understand that they must
learn to behave properly. Why implement
things that would not make sense to those who would experience the meaningless
dread?
Now, while point system might be a
good idea for some older kids, the younger kids suffer greatly. This is where teachers must carefully select
which method is most appropriate for the disciples’ age. I implemented point system for a period of
time to my third grade daughter. She was
well into the concrete operational stage and understood cause and effect quite
well. Her logic had developed in such a
way that she could connect the dots of PR and NR in the end. Not without a struggle I must admit. But it was not a struggle she could not
understand. She understood perfectly
well that her actions bear consequences.
The point system was created to assist her in her learning of the proper
behavior and her learning of staying away from the bad ones. And thus she gladly joined in the choir. As the system was very much clear, she
herself could do the addition and subtraction in her limited cognitive ability,
with guidance. A great advantage of this
custom made point system was that it was particularly tailored for her. It was not designed as a one-size-fits-all
kind of thing. A lot of special things
could be matched for her needs that only fits her and not for anyone else. Therefore she does not compete with other
kids. No feeling of pride, or
embarrassment, or mediocre. She faced
herself. She realized her own failures
and successes. Her understanding was top
priority because it was important for her to go through suffering with
awareness. The meaning is found in her
being aware of the system, the cause and effect, the consequences of actions,
and so on. Once she could relate to
meaning, her learning was guaranteed. With
understanding, the point system becomes enjoyable. With joy the suffering is not as painful as
if it is with confusion. Now, important
to be understood is that all good time has its end. It lasts as long as it is meaningful. It lasted for a year for my daughter. But within that one year she learned things
important for her character formation, proper behavior, and
responsibility. Once the point system
lost its appeal, I did not persist on using it anymore. It would be futile to force her with the point
system that has lost meaning for her.
Once her learning objectives had been attained, I did not keep the
system just because it was working, beautiful, or convenient. A different strategy needed to be devised.
But this custom made system is not
easily designed and implemented for an organized institution like school. Dealing with collective individuals is much
more difficult than dealing with one individual. There are much more constraint when we deal
with a big scale organization. So school
will have to think more creatively and responsibly in designing and
implementing a system of discipline.
School’s hands are tied in the back when it comes down to the need to
tailor made program for each individual.
Diversity is quite on the opposite direction of organized education such
as school. School operates in the
assumption of uniformity. Uniformity is
ingrained within the school structure and operation. With this limitation, wanted or not, school
is not as flexible when dealing with the need to custom made a program for an
individual. It would take forever and a
lot of energy and many people to do so.
Efficiency is then being compromised in the name of effectiveness. But on the other hand, if efficiency is to be
achieved, uniformity is prioritized, consequently effectiveness is
compromised. Such is the difficulty
school has to face.
Since discipline is essential for
the success of education, we then cannot eliminate discipline. At the same time we also cannot reduce the
meaning and the force of discipline to either just R&R or just P. The art of discipline involves both reward
and punishment. The dance of harmony
between reward and punishment must be balanced.
But there is no formula that fits all individual. Education is not a factory. (The thinking and practice that education is
a factory started back about 300 years ago when industrial revolution
began). A factory creates the mold, sets
up the machine, provides the material, and then it produces the product in mass
quantity. One mold, one process, the
same material, produces unlimited amount of products, with the same quality and
standard. School has one goal, but
abstract – meaning it actually covers a lot of possible outcomes, one uniform
process, but with many possible varieties, the same kind of disciples – yeah
right, this is wishful thinking – the fact is no two disciples are exactly
alike, and naively hoping for the same quality of graduates. Every teacher is expected to be wise enough
to conduct the dance in harmonious balance for each disciple. However, the dance process for each
individual requires serious and careful attention from a very skillful
teacher. There are times when the
teacher finds it difficult to maintain the level of excellence expected of
him. So many teachers resort to the
easiest way and still operate within the corridor of schooling, in other words
they choose the minimum work. Yes the
minimum work works too, it is easy on the teacher, but it gives much pressure
on the disciples. The easiest way is through
the uniformity route – minimal work for the teacher. Because the disciples are forced to go
through the same mold while the teacher only needs to plan for one process with
the assumption that they all are expected to achieve the same standard. It won’t do.
Disciples are human beings. They
are not inanimate objects. They are not
even animals.
Now, the course of becoming Jesus’
disciples is spelled out in the Scripture.
There are several passages we are to look to find the proper
instructions. First let us look at Matthew
16:24-26.
24 Then Jesus told his disciples, “If anyone would come after me, let him deny himself and take up his
cross and follow me. 25 For
whoever would save his life will lose it, but whoever loses his life for my
sake will find it. 26 For
what will it profit a man if he gains the whole world and forfeits his soul? Or
what shall a man give in return for his soul?
This
passage shows that becoming Jesus’ disciples is not as easy as it looks. The path is filled with challenges and
suffering. This is because Jesus Himself
walks His life on earth not with ease, but with many challenges and
difficulties. But Jesus never
complains. He never argues back with His
Father in heaven. Instead, he
obeys. He obeys completely. As revealed in Philippians 2:5b-9:
Christ
Jesus, 6 who, though
he was in the form of God, did not count equality with God a thing to be
grasped, 7 but
emptied himself, by taking the form of a servant, being born in the likeness of
men. 8 And being
found in human form, he humbled himself by becoming
obedient to the point of death, even death on a cross.
This is
the final character every disciple of Jesus must have. Because that’s who Jesus is. He is an obedient Son. As we have covered earlier, disciples are on
the course to imitate their master.
Jesus is our master teacher, so we are to imitate Him. If Jesus is an obedient Son, even being
obedient to the point of death, then as His disciples we are to become obedient
children as well, even being obedient to the point of death. So it is not out of proportion when Jesus
says that whoever desires to follow Him must first deny himself and then take
up his cross. Without these two
prerequisites completed, he can’t follow Jesus.
Jesus reveals the path of His disciples in John 15:18-25:
18 “If the world hates
you, know that it has hated me before it hated you. 19 If you were of the world, the world would love you
as its own; but because you are not of the world, but I chose you out of the
world, therefore the world hates you. 20 Remember
the word that I said to you: ‘A servant is not greater than his master.’ If
they persecuted me, they will also persecute you. If they kept my word, they
will also keep yours. 21 But
all these things they will do to you on account of my name, because they do not
know him who sent me. 22 If
I had not come and spoken to them, they would not have been guilty of sin, but
now they have no excuse for their sin. 23 Whoever
hates me hates my Father also. 24 If
I had not done among them the works that no one else did, they would not be guilty
of sin, but now they have seen and hated both me and my Father. 25 But the word that is
written in their Law must be fulfilled: ‘They hated me without a cause.’
The
master teacher is not forcing anyone to become His disciples. We who follow Him know consciously what we
are getting into. The master teacher has
revealed it. His extension teachers too
must teach the same He does. If there is
someone claiming to be an extension teacher of Christ but not teaching what
Jesus teaches, then he is not Jesus’ extension teacher. If Jesus is teaching that the path of His
disciples is being hated by the world, but someone who claims to be a Christian
teacher is teaching that a disciple of Jesus is going to be embraced by the
world, then he is contradicting the teaching of the master teacher; and so it
proves that he is a fake. We all know
that Jesus is persecuted by the world.
We all know that Jesus is hated by the world, rejected ever since He
arrived on earth until the day he died.
And so His disciples will definitely be persecuted, hated, and rejected
by the world. With this full knowledge
is in front of them, the wannabe disciples are given the choice to either take
it or walk away. If they take it, then
they take it fully knowing the challenges.
Then they enter into the discipline of the Lord. The goal is total obedience.
The master teacher orchestrates the
dance between R and P in a wonderful harmonious balance. The reward is spoken by Jesus clearly in
Matthew 19:27-30.
27 Then Peter said in reply, “See, we have left everything
and followed you. What then will we have?” 28 Jesus
said to them, “Truly, I say to you, in
the new world, when the Son of Man will sit on his glorious throne, you who
have followed me will also sit on twelve thrones, judging the twelve tribes of
Israel. 29 And
everyone who has left houses or brothers or sisters or father or mother or
children or lands, for my name’s sake, will receive a hundredfold and will
inherit eternal life. 30 But
many who are first will be last, and the last first.
This is
a delayed reward. The reward is not
given right away. This delayed reward
has a purpose. The purpose is to test
the disciples’ commitment, whether they truly are doing this for God or just
for the reward. Pair this delayed reward
with the challenges mentioned earlier, the process of discipline is done
masterfully. We have learned that sinful
humans easily twist learning as objective and the reward as means into learning
as means and reward as objective. So God
overcomes that by giving them the reward at the very end, the end of time. So His disciples died like their master, but
they did not complain. They obeyed
completely. Their eyes were not on the
reward, but on their master. They have
become like their master. But God is
just, He is not exploiting His disciples to do His bidding and then tosses them
away after using them up. No, God truly
rewards each person with the crown of righteousness.
6 For I am already being poured out as a drink offering,
and the time of my departure has come. 7 I
have fought the good fight, I have finished the race, I have kept the faith. 8 Henceforth there is laid
up for me the crown of righteousness, which the Lord, the righteous judge, will
award to me on that Day, and not only to me but also to all who have loved his
appearing. (2 Timothy 4:6-8)
The
discipline of the Lord is not only about reward, but it is also about
punishment. Jesus rebukes His apostles
when they walk astray. For example
Peter. A stern rebuke Jesus addresses to
Peter at one time.
21 From that time Jesus began to show his disciples that he
must go to Jerusalem and suffer many things from the elders and chief priests
and scribes, and be killed, and on the third day be raised. 22 And Peter took him
aside and began to rebuke him, saying, “Far be it from you, Lord! This shall
never happen to you.” 23 But
he turned and said to Peter, “Get behind me, Satan! You are a hindrance to me.
For you are not setting your mind on the things of God, but on the things of
man.” (Matthew 16:21-23)
What
Jesus does is applying to Peter a painful experience (P) as a direct blow to
his humanistic egotistic comment. Jesus
does not merely take away Peter’s fun by giving him a time out or something,
but He faces Peter head on and rebukes him on his face. In today’s modern education, perhaps Jesus
would be sued and brought to court with an allegation of verbal abuse to a
disciple. Calling someone “Satan” is a
huge offense in the time of Jesus. It is
like calling someone a terrorist in this 21st century. But Jesus has to name it as it is. For what Peter comments is exactly what Satan
desires – self centrism.
So the master teacher uses all the
tools of discipline to make a disciple out of His disciples. The harmony between P and R and the reality
of suffering which He himself goes through and that which the disciples will go
through are in full display and orchestrated in such a way that all the
followers of Jesus would learn to be obedient.
And God is not cruel. He is not
demanding from the disciples things they could not do. God sends the Holy Spirit to dwell within
them to enable them, to encourage them, to live the life as disciples of
Christ.
10 But if Christ is in you, although the body is dead
because of sin, the Spirit is life because of righteousness. 11 If the Spirit of him who
raised Jesus from the dead dwells in you, he who raised Christ Jesus from the
dead will also give life to your mortal bodies through his Spirit who dwells in
you. 12 So then,
brothers, we are debtors, not to the flesh, to live according to the flesh. 13 For if you live
according to the flesh you will die, but
if by the Spirit you put to death the deeds of the body, you will live. 14 For all who are led
by the Spirit of God are sons of God. 15 For
you did not receive the spirit of slavery to fall back into fear, but you have
received the Spirit of adoption as sons, by whom we cry, “Abba! Father!” (Romans 8:10-15)
The
struggle we all experience, between the flesh and the spirit, is a real
struggle. And God sends His Holy Spirit
to give us true life in Christ. And so
we are able to obey even though difficult.
Therefore all of these combined in the hands of the Master Teacher and
be applied to us for our goodness, we can then rest secure. Praise the Lord!
With all the above understanding, if
we are then given the responsibility to disciple, be it as a teacher at home,
or in school, or even as the school curriculum designer, administrator,
education policy maker, we need to carefully craft and harmonize all the tools
of discipline in order to create a conducive learning environment for our
disciples. Do not reduce the tools of
discipline, but use it wisely through the responsible usage of authority and
power bestowed upon us. Understand the
development of our disciples because it will help us devise the discipline
strategy we are going to utilize for them.
Remember the nature of human beings as revealed by God so that we won’t
make the wrong philosophical supposition and thus deviate our educational
practice. Understand that there is no
one-size-fits-all in education, so teachers are to work wiser and harder to
figure out what’s best for our disciples.
Important to heed is that the disciples are actually God’s disciples, so
we are not to set our own standard based on our own achievements and all. But God has set the standard for them. And one of the most important key goals is
obedience. But not obedience to us,
instead obedience to God. If one asks
how, the answer is through the Holy Scripture.
Paul’s instruction to Timothy is important to listen:
14 But as for you, continue in what you have learned and
have firmly believed, knowing from whom you learned it 15 and how from childhood you have been acquainted
with the sacred writings, which are able to make you wise for salvation through
faith in Christ Jesus. 16 All
Scripture is breathed out by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for
correction, and for training in righteousness, 17 that the man of God may be complete, equipped
for every good work. (2 Timothy 3:14-17)
It is
important also to consider carefully that when we design a discipline strategy,
the actual disciples are to gain from it, not other people outside of our
target. By implication, we are not to
burden other people with unnecessary burden.
We are, even, not supposed to burden our disciples with unnecessary
burden. If they are to go through a
difficult and painful process, then we better make sure that it is worth it,
full of meaning that establishes their character in the Lord. Do not devise a discipline path that you
yourself are not willing to go through.
But instead, following our master teacher, we ought to be a model for
our disciples. If we ask them to suffer
for the sake of obeying the Lord, then we better ask ourselves first whether we
have suffered for the sake of obeying the Lord.
Do not be like the lawyers that Jesus condemns for not lifting a finger
on the burden they are laying on other people.
Be a model is the most difficult challenge in devising a discipline
strategy. You must be certain and firm
on the goal of discipline, its process, and all before you yourselves dare to
apply it on your disciples. This
requires faith. And your walking in the
faith is proven when you yourselves have done it. And that’s what Jesus Himself does. And that’s why He is our penultimate model of
discipline. Amen.
No comments:
Post a Comment